000			02928nam0a22003371i 4500
001			6049
003			OSt
005			20250917090408.0
008			100422s2007 xx gr 000 0 und d
020			_a978052092117
040			_aCo-BoBEC _bspa _cCo-BoBEC
041			_aeng
082			_a791.43655973 / F144w
100			_91158 _aFallon, Kris _c1976- _eautor
245	0	0	_aWhere truth lies: _bWhere truth lies: digital culture and documentary media after 9/11 / _cKris Fallon
260			_aCalifornia: _bUniversity of California Press, _c2019
300			_a248 páginas: _c23 cm
520	3		_aIn 2016, when real-estate heir and reality-television figure Donald Trump was unexpectedly elected president of the United States, media were to blame. Mainstream media (the news) had missed a silent majority of working-class voters in their focus on the opinions and preferences of coastal elites. Marginal media (fake news) had manufactured lies and manipulated low-information voters. Quantitative media (data) had used faulty models and outdated polling techniques to predict the outcome. Social media (Twitter) had been weaponized to manipulate the news cycle and bully and intimidate critics. Deleted, hacked, and ultimately leaked media (e-mails) had cast doubt on an otherwise trustworthy candidate. Even the electoral college—a sort of political medium designed to transmit and translate the will of the voters into the constitutional form of elected office—had failed to accurately reflect and communicate the choice of a majority of voters. While the full impact of Trump’s election will take many years to play out, the initial surprise—some might say shock—it generated reveals a great deal about the relationship between politics and media (or politics as media) in contemporary American culture. The first revelation is the vast quantity and heterogeneity of information sources. Data, images, private messages, public proclamations, professional insiders, and renegade outsiders were all deemed credible in some context for some audience. Media have perhaps never before been so numerous or so diverse. The second point is that in spite of this variety, all of these forms are still considered nonfiction media. For the audiences they attract, they engender a degree of faith in their ability to accurately reflect reality. Simply put, they can tell the truth. They are, in other words, documentary media. And finally, of course, they were all wrong.
546			_aTexto en ingles
591			_aColombia
650		0	_aCine documental _919731
650		0	_aMedios digitales _xAspectos políticos _92781
650		0	_aMedios de comunicación _xObjetividad _zEstados Unidos _ySiglo XXI _954796
650		0	_aRedes sociales en linea _xAspectos políticos _ySiglo XXI _954873
942			_2ddc _cBK _aBECMA
999			_c97235 _d97235
999			_d97235
999			_d97235
999			_d97235
999			_d97235
999			_d97235